Ian’s blogomatic

 

Learning learning

Teaching Teaching & Understanding Understanding

I came across this video this morning (thank you delicious popular links RSS feed). It is mostly a call for constructivism , and contains a more cogent explanation of this than any I remember receiving during my Grad Dip. In fact the film feels very clear and digestible- what you would hope for from educators.

A couple of John Biggs frameworks I hadn’t heard of were mentioned. One (SOLO) is a thinking taxonomy not entirely dissimilar to Bloom’s. The other was his  “three levels of thinking about teaching”

Level 1 – What the students are (good students/bad students)
Level 2 – What the teacher does  (good teachers, bad teachers)
Level 3 – What students do (the outcomes of the teaching)

This is instantly familiar, although I haven’t seen it before. It ‘rings a bell’. A lot of the language in my school is not exactly “good kid, bad kid” but probably falls into this category: This student is easy to teach, this student needs help, why won’t this student do the work etc.

In a discussion with my line manager and another teacher yesterday about a student, who is doing better in maths than previous experience suggests he should, the conversation was more at level two. Why is this student working well for teacher A but not for teacher B, what are those teachers doing differently.

My position on this spectrum is near the cusp of level one and level two. I know the theory, and where I need to be, but I’m not living it yet.

Filed under  //   teaching  

Comments [0]

Teaching the teachers

(image: Jessica Hagy @ indexed)

I’ve been out of the classroom for a couple of days on graduate modules. Unlike some teachers, I find the opportunity to step back and look at and think about our practice revitalising and useful in a practical sense. You might imagine a seminar room of beginning teachers could find talking about and experiencing good teaching intimidating. If so, I didn’t notice.

Filed under  //   teaching  

Comments [2]

Bird and the Bee

Comments [0]

Image hosting

You may have noticed the M&M photo missing from my earlier post. I had gotten excited when I figured I could drag an image from web page and drop it into an email. I started a Google Sites web page because that seemed like an easy way to get an image on to a web page so I could drag it off into a Gmail email. Once I had grabbed the photo from the site's preview page I deleted it, sent in my blog post to Posterous and was happy.

The next day the image had disappeared. I think what happened is that when you drop an image into a Gmail email it is actually just the link (which is different to what I imagine Outlook does) and the link expired when Google expired the page I was creating but never saved.

So I need to host my photos somewhere public on the web if I want to email photo posts from Gmail. I already have a Flickr account which would be fine, except I am a bit snobbish about what I post there. I know a lot of people use it to store their happy snaps, but there are so many good photographers I feel I should only post good photos, or at least quirky and interesting shots. I realise how pathetic that sounds, but well, that's how I feel. There are a number of simple, easy photo hosting sites - Photobucket is the one I seem to see most on Digg. I chose Imageshack, simply because there was the controls to upload my photo right on the front page - no joining.

Slightly related to this is that I was frustrated that there was no "Image" control in the WYSIWYG editor for Posterous. Since you could just drag web image/links into Gmail I wondered if you could do the same with the Posterous editor - and you can. Yay!


Comments [1]

Lunar eclipse

I only got up a couple of times to look last night's lunar eclipse, I should have been more organised and camped out with the kids. Even here in WA it wasn't completely occluded. This was about 4:30

img182/9551/moonimg0405ml9.jpg

<edit>

A good explanation of luna eclipses is at Mr Eclipse.

I love the way science lends itself to being tested. You could tell your kids the Moon's orbital plane is tilted 5° relative to the Earth's but they wouldn't absorb it the way they did this morning standing outside watching the evidence.

Comments [1]

Mutant m&m

Amongst my peanut m&m's today was this specimen. It was flattened-ish ending up like a giant mutated Smartie. To really top things off, it didn't even have a peanut inside.

http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/4899/munted1308081634fn8.jpg

The whole incident reminded me of the 2004? Internet meme - M&M evolution.

   

Comments [1]

Inlining images using Gmail

One small issue I have been having is getting images into my posterous. I use Gmail and I thought it was only possible to attach images and not to have them in-line with the text. This sucked a bit, since any I sent to the posterous blog appeared at the bottom. I could go in and edit them straight away, but by then it had been sent off to the RSS feed.

Looking around I found a solution at Digital Inspiration - and it's not rocket science, just drag the images into the email as you are composing it.

Here is one image.



Here is another.



Easy when you know how!

Comments [0]

This way up

I couldn't help noticing in the beach volleyball against Australia that the Brazilian girls have written "BRA" on their tops.

Straight away makes you wonder what's written on the bottom half

   

(Image credits Heinz Schmid and Reuters)

 

Comments [0]

Yay! Gmail working again.

Phew. After about 40 minutes it's back on.

Comments [1]

My Gmail is down.

This is not want I want to see first thing in the morning:
 
 
 
I live in my email, and I have trusted it all to Gmail. Hopefully it is shortlived.

Comments [0]